Amendments to the Building Act threaten monuments, experts wrote to Babiš

Publisher
ČTK
26.01.2026 20:50
Czech Republic

Prague

Prague - Representatives of the academic community warned in an open letter to Prime Minister Andrej Babiš (ANO) about the impacts of amendments to the building law on heritage preservation. According to them, the wording of the regulation, which lawmakers are set to discuss this week, weakens heritage preservation and poses a threat even in an international context. The letter from 15 experts, which includes seven objections, including criticism of the abolition of protective zones, is available to ČTK. ČTK is seeking a response from the Prime Minister.


The amendments to the law, which Babiš's government approved at its first meeting on December 16 last year, according to the letter, mechanically abolish protective zones of heritage reserves and zones. This includes monuments listed on the UNESCO World Heritage List, such as Prague, Kutná Hora, and Český Krumlov.

The zones protect harmonious architectural units, traditional panoramas, distant views, and the image of historical settlements. "The adoption of the proposals in their presented form would mean a drastic reduction in the level of protection for these values,” states the letter.

Its signatories hold leading and highest positions at various universities. Among them is the Dean of the Faculty of Architecture at the Czech Technical University Dalibor Hlaváček, the Rector of the Prague Academy of Art, Architecture and Design Tomáš Pospiszyl, the Rector of the AAAD in Prague Jindřich Vybíral, the Director of the Institute for Art History at the Faculty of Arts of Charles University Marie Rakušanová and her deputy Richard Biegel, the head of the Institute of Christian Art History at the Catholic Theological Faculty of Prague Vít Vlnas, the Director of the Institute of Art History at the Czech Academy of Sciences Tomáš Winter, and the Chairwoman of the Art History Society in the Czech Lands Anna Pravdová.

Among the recipients are, in addition to Babiš, also Deputy Prime Minister Karel Havlíček (ANO), Minister of Culture Oto Klempíř (Motorists), Minister for Regional Development Zuzana Mrázová (ANO), and the Chair of the parliamentary media committee František Talíř (KDU-ČSL). Mrázová previously stated that amendments to the building law would trigger changes in other laws, including heritage protection law.

The letter also criticizes the abolition of binding opinions on interventions in buildings in heritage zones and the transfer of decision-making authority directly to the building authority. According to the letter, heritage experts would only be able to comment on new building projects at the earliest stage.

"The proposed amendment overall weakens the protection of the public interest in the protection of monuments, which the heritage law is meant to safeguard,” the letter states. It characterized the new option, according to which builders could consult their project with another expert in the field of architecture or heritage preservation in addition to the National Heritage Institute, as unsystematic.

The signatories of the letter to the Prime Minister wrote that they understand the effort to simplify and improve the building approval process, but the adoption of the amendment in its current form would have significant negative impacts on the fate of monuments in the Czech Republic, including UNESCO-protected sites. "We remind you that the Czech Republic was elected in November 2025 to the World Heritage Committee, and its prestige and credibility in the field of heritage preservation would be significantly harmed by the adoption of problematic proposals,” they added.

According to today's report by the organization Arnika, the adoption of the building law amendment would significantly weaken the protection of monuments, nature, and the right to defend against illegal buildings. It noted that the amendment did not go through the standard commenting process.
The English translation is powered by AI tool. Switch to Czech to view the original text source.
0 comments
add comment

Related articles

0 30.09.2026 | Senators want to propose the cancellation of the construction amendment to the Constitutional Court in November
0 17.09.2026 | President Pavel signed the controversial coalition amendment to the building law
0 17.09.2026 | The Czech branch of ICOMOS also requested the president to veto the building law
0 16.09.2026 | Mrázová: The construction amendment is a priority; the veto would have to be overridden in the Chamber
0 15.09.2026 | The Association of Local Governments requests the president to veto the amendment to the building law
0 09.09.2026 | The Chamber of Deputies overruled the Senate and confirmed the coalition amendment to the construction law
0 09.09.2026 | Opposition criticizes the construction amendment rejected by the Senate, the minister defends it
0 21.08.2026 | Towns and environmentalists welcome the unapproved construction amendment, developers and entrepreneurs do not
0 20.08.2026 | The Senate rejected the contentious construction amendment, critics referred to it as a monstrosity
0 19.08.2026 | Senators of TOP 09 and ODS are ready to turn to the Constitutional Court due to the construction law
0 19.08.2026 | Senators should not approve the amendment to the building law according to architects
0 13.08.2026 | The Association of Historical Sites is concerned about the impacts of the amendment to the Building Act on monuments
0 11.07.2026 | Experts: The Building Act will accelerate construction or negatively impact quality of life
0 11.07.2026 | The draft of the building law contains errors and favors developers
0 11.07.2026 | President: The new building office may not be able to fulfill its role; the permitting process would take longer
0 10.07.2026 | The Chamber today approved the construction amendment regarding the establishment of state building authorities
0 10.07.2026 | The Chamber has resumed the approval of the contentious construction amendment, it should vote
0 09.07.2026 | Schillerová: The budgetary impacts of the construction amendment depend on its approved form
0 08.07.2026 | The Chamber did not complete the approval of the building amendment after the dispute following Havlíček's speech
0 14.05.2026 | MMR: The functions of the new construction administration can be ensured with half of the current employees
0 01.04.2026 | The parliamentary committee has again suspended the discussion on the amendment to expedite building permit approvals
0 23.02.2026 | Kutná Hora has called on the Plumbers to discuss the amendment to the building act
0 18.02.2026 | The Chamber of Deputies' Legal Committee has suspended the deliberation on the amendment to expedite building permits
0 13.02.2026 | <trans-title>Self-governments: The amendment to the construction law may once again bring uncertainty to the construction industry</trans-title>
0 29.01.2026 | The deputies debated for several hours about the amendment to the building law
0 28.01.2026 | <p>The construction law can assist with development, but it can also threaten the character of cities.</p>
1 27.01.2026 | The construction law is likely to reintroduce a unified state construction administration
0 17.12.2025 | Selection of information about the latest changes to the building code
0 05.11.2025 | The new government wants to change the building code and approve it quickly, Havlíček confirmed
0 28.12.2023 | The office will start allowing large constructions according to the new building law from January
0 30.06.2023 | The amendment to the building law will come into effect, bringing a new office for large constructions
0 24.03.2023 | Platform: The draft of the building code has not fulfilled its potential
1 07.03.2023 | The construction law will likely make it easier to obtain opinions from certain authorities
0 06.02.2020 | From the current 714 building authorities in the Czech Republic, at least 383 will be preserved
0 11.01.2020 | The Supreme Courts criticize the construction law, MMR will negotiate with them
0 21.12.2011 | The government approved the proposal to amend the construction law